Aibstracts
Use case · Academic research teams

Spend your time on the science, not the screening

Build a rigorous review without the manual scaffolding, keep the method transparent enough to publish, and trace every conclusion back to the source.

The problem

A systematic review should not consume the research it supports

For a PhD student or research group, methodological rigor is non-negotiable. The manual workload is the real problem, and reviewer time is scarce. Too often, the review either consumes the research it was meant to support or quietly cuts corners.

  • Months of screening before the real analysis begins
  • Methodology hard to document transparently
  • Limited reviewer time for dual appraisal
  • Conclusions hard to trace back in peer review
How Aibstracts fits

Rigor that is faster to produce and far easier to defend

Rigor without the manual burden

You go from a research question to a running search in one workflow, so the review supports your research instead of competing with it.

Methodology you can show

Protocol versions, screening reasons, and appraisal answers are all recorded and exportable, so transparency is automatic when a supervisor or journal asks.

Conclusions you can trace back

Every judgment and extracted fact links to the exact passage in the PDF, which makes defending your review in peer review straightforward.

Dual appraisal without doubling the burden

Structured workflows and recorded decisions make scarce reviewer time go further when a second pair of eyes is required.

  • PRISMA-ready workflow
  • Source-grounded outputs
  • Protocol version history
  • Reviewer-controlled decisions
For teams whose evidence has to hold up

Start your review today

The Free plan covers one full review a month, with no card required.

A free plan is available, no card required